Oleg Prihodko vs Yan Bondarevskiy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W W W L
Form
L L L L L W W W L LH2H: Prihodko 2 - 1 Bondarevskiy
They have played 6 sets in total, with Prihodko winning 4 and Bondarevskiy winning 2. The last match between Prihodko and Bondarevskiy was at the Sibiu Challenger, 27-09-2021, Q3, Clay with Yan Bondarevskiy getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oleg Prihodko | 2 |
| Yan Bondarevskiy | 1 |
Sibiu Challenger(27-09-2021)
7
6
6
4
| Prihodko | Stats | Bondarevskiy |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (10-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 345 | Ranking | 825 |
| 309 | Highest Rank | 414 |
| 27 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 6 | Titles | 2 |
| 59% (355-250) | Career Total W/L | 59% (203-143) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Prihodko VS Bondarevskiy H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Oleg Prihodko
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
82%
(
53 of
65)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
Prihodko VS Bondarevskiy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 35 | Games Won | 28 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:7:20 | Average Match Time | 1:7:20 |
| 64% (91/142) | 1st Serve % | 76% (116/153) |
| 68% (62/91) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (72/116) |
| 51% (26/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (21/37) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 39% (60/153) | Return Points Win % | 38% (54/142) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Oleg Prihodko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Oleg Prihodko
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
54%
(
72 of
134)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
58 of
87)
55%
(
34 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
37%
(
50 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
131
Total Points Won
129
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Tomasz Berkieta
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Oleg Prihodko
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Oleg Prihodko
64%
(
73 of
114)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
66%
(
27 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
34 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Oleg Prihodko
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
6
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano D'Agostino
Player
Oleg Prihodko
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
16
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
21 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Oleg Prihodko
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Yan Bondarevskiy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Islam Orynbasar
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
69%
(
20 of
29)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
42
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Marco De Rossi
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Maxim Zhukov
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
70 of
96)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
79%
(
46 of
58)
10
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Pennaforti
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simone Roncalli
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Yan Bondarevskiy
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (355/250) | Win/Loss | 59% (203/143) |
| 58% (794/580) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (454/331) |
| 54% (6888/5974) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3825/3342) |
| 54% (52/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (65/45) |
| 60% (284/193) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (132/87) |
| 59% (19/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (6/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1477 | Aces Total | 284 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 900 | Total Double Faults | 604 |
| 1:14:16 | Average Match Time | 1:7:16 |
| 450.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 442.1 |
| 65% (19080/29429) | 1st Serve % | 69% (10944/15821) |
| 67% (12776/19080) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (6881/10944) |
| 49% (5041/10349) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2330/4877) |
| 44% (1456/3303) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (850/1851) |
| 42% (12779/30602) | Return Points Win % | 43% (6966/16094) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (45/47) | Challenger W/L | 43% (15/20) |
| 61% (310/202) | Futures W/L | 61% (188/122) |
| 59% (352/598) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (199/340) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (77/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (28/73) |
| 49% (83/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (44/93) |
| 88% (357/313) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (208/182) |
| 12% (357/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (208/26) |
| 17% (247/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (138/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
